[Communications] Entrance for Conference from Arts Building

[M Toy]

Hi everyone,

Yes, there is an elevator in the Arts Building (located in the West
corridor ) and Mr. Swanson said that it's no problem to switch to the Arts
Building lobby.   However,  FYI, the student theater group will also be in
the Arts Building setting up for their Spring Play at 7pm.   It shouldn't
be an issue since the students will just be in and out and mainly in the
theater.

Hi JW and Mamie, Please let me know if you or anyone else wants to go check
out the Art's building lobby and what date.  We would have to do it after
classes again approx 3:15pm.

Thanks.
May

The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient
specified in message only. Do not share any part of this message with any
third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this
message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its
deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur again.



On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:06 AM Angela Taylor <taylor3433 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Is there a elevator?  I know we didn't complete the conversation as a
> committee as to weather or not we were going to pay to use the bridge.  I
> will allow M Toy to figure it out as you requested Lorraine.
>
> Thanks
> Angela
>
> On Monday, February 10, 2020, 10:13:02 AM CST, Lorraine Kells <
> lxkells at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> That's great news; if using the Arts building lobby costs us no more then
> we can definitely consider using it as it's easier to enter there from the
> parking lot as I understand it, and it has the added benefit of putting
> attendees through the bridge with the vendors set up.  Please verify with
> Matt that the switch costs us no more and we'll go from there.  Your help
> has been invaluable.
>
> Of ourse JW and Mamie who are running registration will want to check it
> out as we did the hall of the main building.
>
> Let us know when you talk to Matt.
>
> Lorraine
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:59 AM M Toy <mtoy.usa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Lorraine,
>
> I've not been involved on that decision.  I offered to follow up with Matt
> Swanson when the decision was made by the committee.
>
> I suggested it up as an option when we met at WY so that folks would walk
> thru the bridge area and by the vendors going and coming to the conference
> to provide more exposure to the vendors.  The cost of the Arts Lobby is the
> same as the main building lobby so there is no extra charge...we would just
> swap out the lobbies.
>
> If the decision is to put the vendors in the bridge then I think the main
> entrance for the conference should be in the Arts Building.  If the
> decision is to put the vendors in the Blue House and NOT  the bridge, I
> would recommend using the entrance to the Academic Building on Laflin.
>
> May
>
>
> The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient
> specified in message only. Do not share any part of this message with any
> third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this
> message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its
> deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur again.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:45 AM Lorraine Kells <lxkells at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> May,
>
> You and Angela spoke briefly last time we met in the conference room about
> the possibility of using the entrance from the Arts Building to the
> bridge.  I haven't heard from either of you if that went any further. Do
> you think it's worth pursuing?
>
> Everyone has been quite busy with conference planning, so I may be out of
> the loop on this and missed the communication
>
> Let me know.  Thanks
>
> Lorraine
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chicagocommunitygardens.org/pipermail/communications_chicagocommunitygardens.org/attachments/20200210/21372464/attachment-0002.html>